<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Florida&#8217;s no-huddle: More plays for me equals less chance of you winning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://smartfootball.com/uncategorized/floridas-no-huddle-more-plays-for-me-equals-less-chance-of-you-winning/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://smartfootball.com/uncategorized/floridas-no-huddle-more-plays-for-me-equals-less-chance-of-you-winning</link>
	<description>Analysis and strategy by Chris.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 21:20:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: BobG</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/uncategorized/floridas-no-huddle-more-plays-for-me-equals-less-chance-of-you-winning/comment-page-1#comment-600</link>
		<dc:creator>BobG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 19:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=348#comment-600</guid>
		<description>It is no secret how Urban came to using this tactic.  He told us.  He said that they always question their defensive coaches as to what is hardest for them to defend; then consider incorporating it in the offense.

There are positive factors for the Gators.
1.  They are superbly conditioned
2.   They have outstanding defensive depth, so do not worry about their own defense tiring.

From his comments, I do not believe they plan to use the tactic as their base offense, but to turn it on and off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is no secret how Urban came to using this tactic.  He told us.  He said that they always question their defensive coaches as to what is hardest for them to defend; then consider incorporating it in the offense.</p>
<p>There are positive factors for the Gators.<br />
1.  They are superbly conditioned<br />
2.   They have outstanding defensive depth, so do not worry about their own defense tiring.</p>
<p>From his comments, I do not believe they plan to use the tactic as their base offense, but to turn it on and off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/uncategorized/floridas-no-huddle-more-plays-for-me-equals-less-chance-of-you-winning/comment-page-1#comment-562</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 05:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=348#comment-562</guid>
		<description>@ Andy &amp; Chris

I found the cross-pollination:

http://espn.go.com/blog/bigten/post/_/id/1057/northwestern-offense-has-roots-with-rodriguez

By the way, great site!  I love the X&#039;s and O&#039;s of football, and this site delivers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Andy &amp; Chris</p>
<p>I found the cross-pollination:</p>
<p><a href="http://espn.go.com/blog/bigten/post/_/id/1057/northwestern-offense-has-roots-with-rodriguez" rel="nofollow">http://espn.go.com/blog/bigten/post/_/id/1057/northwestern-offense-has-roots-with-rodriguez</a></p>
<p>By the way, great site!  I love the X&#8217;s and O&#8217;s of football, and this site delivers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/uncategorized/floridas-no-huddle-more-plays-for-me-equals-less-chance-of-you-winning/comment-page-1#comment-557</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 22:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=348#comment-557</guid>
		<description>This seems to be a logical next step. With the new clock rules that slow the game down more and have cut into the snaps a team can get on offense to get more snaps you&#039;ve got to speed up the offense.

Gus at Auburn ran 79 plays against LA Tech but stated that was horribly slow and wanted 85-90 snaps as the norm. 

This will mean teams have to change their conditioning even more to keep up with this offense. Franklin had Auburn lighten its offensive linemen up to keep up the momentum but for whatever reason Auburn never ran that speed. Gus had the offensive line put weight back on but the team as a whole did a tremendous amount of cardio work to be conditioned for this offense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems to be a logical next step. With the new clock rules that slow the game down more and have cut into the snaps a team can get on offense to get more snaps you&#8217;ve got to speed up the offense.</p>
<p>Gus at Auburn ran 79 plays against LA Tech but stated that was horribly slow and wanted 85-90 snaps as the norm. </p>
<p>This will mean teams have to change their conditioning even more to keep up with this offense. Franklin had Auburn lighten its offensive linemen up to keep up the momentum but for whatever reason Auburn never ran that speed. Gus had the offensive line put weight back on but the team as a whole did a tremendous amount of cardio work to be conditioned for this offense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ConnGator</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/uncategorized/floridas-no-huddle-more-plays-for-me-equals-less-chance-of-you-winning/comment-page-1#comment-554</link>
		<dc:creator>ConnGator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=348#comment-554</guid>
		<description>&quot;Upset-repellent,&quot; I love that phrase.

Additionally, this would imply that the better the opponent the slower you should play.  So since Florida was equal or slightly better than Oklahoma they should not have played very fast.  And that&#039;s exactly what happened.  They got ready quickly but did not really snap the ball that fast.  So Stoops is not a bad coach, just an unlucky one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Upset-repellent,&#8221; I love that phrase.</p>
<p>Additionally, this would imply that the better the opponent the slower you should play.  So since Florida was equal or slightly better than Oklahoma they should not have played very fast.  And that&#8217;s exactly what happened.  They got ready quickly but did not really snap the ball that fast.  So Stoops is not a bad coach, just an unlucky one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/uncategorized/floridas-no-huddle-more-plays-for-me-equals-less-chance-of-you-winning/comment-page-1#comment-552</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=348#comment-552</guid>
		<description>An interesting, easy install part of the balls to the wall hurry up is the &quot;Xerox&quot; or &quot;Copy&quot; concept.  

Say your offense just had a big play, be it off an IZ or a Post against Cov. 2.  Offensive coaches on the sideline just start yelling &quot;Copy! Copy!&quot; or &quot;Xerox! Xerox!&quot; or whatever key word you&#039;d like to use, and then the offense busts it back to the line to run the exact same play in the exact same formation, with the idea being that the defense is still reeling from the last play that they might be to confused in a short time frame to be able to make the proper adjustments, thus increasing the likelihood of another big play by the offense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting, easy install part of the balls to the wall hurry up is the &#8220;Xerox&#8221; or &#8220;Copy&#8221; concept.  </p>
<p>Say your offense just had a big play, be it off an IZ or a Post against Cov. 2.  Offensive coaches on the sideline just start yelling &#8220;Copy! Copy!&#8221; or &#8220;Xerox! Xerox!&#8221; or whatever key word you&#8217;d like to use, and then the offense busts it back to the line to run the exact same play in the exact same formation, with the idea being that the defense is still reeling from the last play that they might be to confused in a short time frame to be able to make the proper adjustments, thus increasing the likelihood of another big play by the offense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shrubbery or battle cry? It&#8217;s still a good idea. &#171; Get The Picture</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/uncategorized/floridas-no-huddle-more-plays-for-me-equals-less-chance-of-you-winning/comment-page-1#comment-544</link>
		<dc:creator>Shrubbery or battle cry? It&#8217;s still a good idea. &#171; Get The Picture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 17:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=348#comment-544</guid>
		<description>[...] or battle cry? It&#8217;s still a good&#160;idea.  Jump to Comments  This makes a lot of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] or battle cry? It&#8217;s still a good&nbsp;idea.  Jump to Comments  This makes a lot of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Nagler</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/uncategorized/floridas-no-huddle-more-plays-for-me-equals-less-chance-of-you-winning/comment-page-1#comment-540</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Nagler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 17:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=348#comment-540</guid>
		<description>Manning and the Colts have been doing this for HOW long? Of course, Chris&#039; bias against the NFL won&#039;t allow him to note that. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Manning and the Colts have been doing this for HOW long? Of course, Chris&#8217; bias against the NFL won&#8217;t allow him to note that. <img src='http://smartfootball.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/uncategorized/floridas-no-huddle-more-plays-for-me-equals-less-chance-of-you-winning/comment-page-1#comment-539</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=348#comment-539</guid>
		<description>Following up Stan&#039;s point, no huddle is also a good way of controlling personnel packages.  Where you&#039;ve got versatility in your athletes, as Florida does, you can create an unfavourable personnel match up and then run a series of plays against it, possibly using a progression of plays in the same basic concept out of the playbook - the Colts are a good example of a team which does this in the NFL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Following up Stan&#8217;s point, no huddle is also a good way of controlling personnel packages.  Where you&#8217;ve got versatility in your athletes, as Florida does, you can create an unfavourable personnel match up and then run a series of plays against it, possibly using a progression of plays in the same basic concept out of the playbook &#8211; the Colts are a good example of a team which does this in the NFL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stan</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/uncategorized/floridas-no-huddle-more-plays-for-me-equals-less-chance-of-you-winning/comment-page-1#comment-538</link>
		<dc:creator>stan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=348#comment-538</guid>
		<description>There are other, perhaps more important reasons to go no huddle.  First, it puts more emphasis on depth.  And that&#039;s a Florida advantage.  Second, it tends to make the defense play more vanilla.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are other, perhaps more important reasons to go no huddle.  First, it puts more emphasis on depth.  And that&#8217;s a Florida advantage.  Second, it tends to make the defense play more vanilla.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/uncategorized/floridas-no-huddle-more-plays-for-me-equals-less-chance-of-you-winning/comment-page-1#comment-536</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 15:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=348#comment-536</guid>
		<description>Also, I fixed the spelling of Charleston Southern in my original post. Thanks for pull-quoting so I could see that, Chris.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, I fixed the spelling of Charleston Southern in my original post. Thanks for pull-quoting so I could see that, Chris.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
