<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bill Parcells&#8217; four rules for drafting a quarterback</title>
	<atom:link href="http://smartfootball.com/quarterbacking/bill-parcells-four-rules-for-drafting-a-quarterback/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://smartfootball.com/quarterbacking/bill-parcells-four-rules-for-drafting-a-quarterback</link>
	<description>Analysis and strategy by Chris.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 06:45:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: In the 4th round, the Dolphins select . . . Ricky Stanzi &#124; GazetteOnline.com</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/quarterbacking/bill-parcells-four-rules-for-drafting-a-quarterback/comment-page-1#comment-8405</link>
		<dc:creator>In the 4th round, the Dolphins select . . . Ricky Stanzi &#124; GazetteOnline.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 20:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=860#comment-8405</guid>
		<description>[...] dissected by the announcers. Here&#8217;s a link, here&#8217;s a link and here&#8217;s another link, Smartfootball.com, where astute reader Eric found this thought and brought it to my [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] dissected by the announcers. Here&#8217;s a link, here&#8217;s a link and here&#8217;s another link, Smartfootball.com, where astute reader Eric found this thought and brought it to my [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How badly do you want a QB? Should the Raiders draft one this year? - Oakland Raiders Forum &#124; Message Board - Where the Raider Nation lives!</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/quarterbacking/bill-parcells-four-rules-for-drafting-a-quarterback/comment-page-1#comment-6958</link>
		<dc:creator>How badly do you want a QB? Should the Raiders draft one this year? - Oakland Raiders Forum &#124; Message Board - Where the Raider Nation lives!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 02:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=860#comment-6958</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Parcells</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/quarterbacking/bill-parcells-four-rules-for-drafting-a-quarterback/comment-page-1#comment-6567</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Parcells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 20:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=860#comment-6567</guid>
		<description>I was drunk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was drunk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrClean</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/quarterbacking/bill-parcells-four-rules-for-drafting-a-quarterback/comment-page-1#comment-6551</link>
		<dc:creator>MrClean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 04:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=860#comment-6551</guid>
		<description>&quot; TOD22 says:
March 11, 2010 at 11:59 am

Haven’t seen it mentioned, but Parcells violated these rules himself when he took Drew Bledsoe with the first pick of the 1993 draft. Bledsoe had left Wazzou after his junior year. So it seems that even for Parcells and even for the highest of picks, they are really more for guidance than hard and fast rules.&quot;

Did Parcells have final say in the draft decisions when the Pats took Bledsoe? It was the same power structure in place there, I think, when he made his famous comment a few years later, about if he is asked to cook the meal he should be able to shop for the groceries. Oh, I think given the Pats situation at the time, that he would have most likely still taken Bledsoe if did have final say so re the draft. Then again to a guy like Parcells, played like Marvin &quot;Shade Tree&quot; Jones and John Copeland must have looked very tempting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; TOD22 says:<br />
March 11, 2010 at 11:59 am</p>
<p>Haven’t seen it mentioned, but Parcells violated these rules himself when he took Drew Bledsoe with the first pick of the 1993 draft. Bledsoe had left Wazzou after his junior year. So it seems that even for Parcells and even for the highest of picks, they are really more for guidance than hard and fast rules.&#8221;</p>
<p>Did Parcells have final say in the draft decisions when the Pats took Bledsoe? It was the same power structure in place there, I think, when he made his famous comment a few years later, about if he is asked to cook the meal he should be able to shop for the groceries. Oh, I think given the Pats situation at the time, that he would have most likely still taken Bledsoe if did have final say so re the draft. Then again to a guy like Parcells, played like Marvin &#8220;Shade Tree&#8221; Jones and John Copeland must have looked very tempting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blatant Homerism</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/quarterbacking/bill-parcells-four-rules-for-drafting-a-quarterback/comment-page-1#comment-6508</link>
		<dc:creator>Blatant Homerism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 01:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=860#comment-6508</guid>
		<description>I believe that Romo would have met all of the qualifications, albeit at the I-AA level. 

I think it&#039;s important to keep in mind, though, that these are guidelines for drafting a QB -- and presumably drafting one in the early rounds. The Cowboys took a flyer on Romo when he went undrafted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that Romo would have met all of the qualifications, albeit at the I-AA level. </p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s important to keep in mind, though, that these are guidelines for drafting a QB &#8212; and presumably drafting one in the early rounds. The Cowboys took a flyer on Romo when he went undrafted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Reiter</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/quarterbacking/bill-parcells-four-rules-for-drafting-a-quarterback/comment-page-1#comment-6470</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Reiter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 22:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=860#comment-6470</guid>
		<description>Did Romo meet all these qualifications?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did Romo meet all these qualifications?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Allen</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/quarterbacking/bill-parcells-four-rules-for-drafting-a-quarterback/comment-page-1#comment-6353</link>
		<dc:creator>David Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=860#comment-6353</guid>
		<description>This is merely a system of reducing risk.  Not guaranteed to work 100% of the time (what is?) but is intended to get the odds in your favor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is merely a system of reducing risk.  Not guaranteed to work 100% of the time (what is?) but is intended to get the odds in your favor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndrewC</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/quarterbacking/bill-parcells-four-rules-for-drafting-a-quarterback/comment-page-1#comment-6322</link>
		<dc:creator>AndrewC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=860#comment-6322</guid>
		<description>2 stats would be interesting and might better evaluate the Tuna Rules.  First, it would be interesting to see what percent of high draft QBs meet all 4 rules.  The stat that 5 of the 7 Superbowl winning QBs met all 4 rules would be meaningless if 80% of draft QBs met the rules, but very important if that number was only 20%.

Second, I always hate when QBs are judged on superbowl wins.  Even if superbowl wins is the end-goal and the quarterback position is the most important position, football is a game where a team can rarely be carried by only one player.  Evaluate the Tuna Rules to some other criteria besides superbowl wins.  Pro Bowl nominations are still flawed but might be better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2 stats would be interesting and might better evaluate the Tuna Rules.  First, it would be interesting to see what percent of high draft QBs meet all 4 rules.  The stat that 5 of the 7 Superbowl winning QBs met all 4 rules would be meaningless if 80% of draft QBs met the rules, but very important if that number was only 20%.</p>
<p>Second, I always hate when QBs are judged on superbowl wins.  Even if superbowl wins is the end-goal and the quarterback position is the most important position, football is a game where a team can rarely be carried by only one player.  Evaluate the Tuna Rules to some other criteria besides superbowl wins.  Pro Bowl nominations are still flawed but might be better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uncomfortable silence &#171; Bleed Scarlet</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/quarterbacking/bill-parcells-four-rules-for-drafting-a-quarterback/comment-page-1#comment-6208</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncomfortable silence &#171; Bleed Scarlet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=860#comment-6208</guid>
		<description>[...] Dr. Saturday, Smart Football quotes Bill Parcells on his four rules for drafting a quarterback, which curiously enough all apply to Mike Teel. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dr. Saturday, Smart Football quotes Bill Parcells on his four rules for drafting a quarterback, which curiously enough all apply to Mike Teel. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buck</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/quarterbacking/bill-parcells-four-rules-for-drafting-a-quarterback/comment-page-1#comment-6186</link>
		<dc:creator>Buck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=860#comment-6186</guid>
		<description>There are also some famous busts who met all those criteria.  The other day I heard a couple of radio sports talk show guys discussing how everyone could have missed on Brady Quinn.  He may have been a reach in the first round, but still everyone had him going in the early second round and right now you&#039;d be hard pressed to find a team that would give up a fourth or fifth for him, even though he&#039;s been in the league and started some games.  

I remember having this discussion back when Quinn was drafted (he would have also have met FO/Lewin criteria, by the way).  At the time I took a look at his stats and remember there was a huge difference between his numbers against lower level teams, i.e., teams with losing records.  In the NFL, all the defenses you face are great (relative to college), and even though your skill players are better too, there&#039;s not a huge differential between the talent of your offense and the talent of the defense you are facing, in most cases.  In college, against really poor teams a QB can rack up big numbers.  

I&#039;m not a GM or an NFL scout, but I&#039;d want to know what a QB&#039;s numbers were against competition equal to the level of talent on his college team.  If he is Tarzan against the cupcakes and Jane against the upper level teams, that would raise a red flag for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are also some famous busts who met all those criteria.  The other day I heard a couple of radio sports talk show guys discussing how everyone could have missed on Brady Quinn.  He may have been a reach in the first round, but still everyone had him going in the early second round and right now you&#8217;d be hard pressed to find a team that would give up a fourth or fifth for him, even though he&#8217;s been in the league and started some games.  </p>
<p>I remember having this discussion back when Quinn was drafted (he would have also have met FO/Lewin criteria, by the way).  At the time I took a look at his stats and remember there was a huge difference between his numbers against lower level teams, i.e., teams with losing records.  In the NFL, all the defenses you face are great (relative to college), and even though your skill players are better too, there&#8217;s not a huge differential between the talent of your offense and the talent of the defense you are facing, in most cases.  In college, against really poor teams a QB can rack up big numbers.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not a GM or an NFL scout, but I&#8217;d want to know what a QB&#8217;s numbers were against competition equal to the level of talent on his college team.  If he is Tarzan against the cupcakes and Jane against the upper level teams, that would raise a red flag for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
