
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The &#8220;smash&#8221; route against man coverage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://smartfootball.com/passing/the-smash-route-against-man/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://smartfootball.com/passing/the-smash-route-against-man</link>
	<description>Analysis and strategy by Chris.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:51:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dirtybird</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/passing/the-smash-route-against-man/comment-page-1#comment-29104</link>
		<dc:creator>Dirtybird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 19:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=645#comment-29104</guid>
		<description>We if we know it is man we like to tag routes by the outside guys.  One other poster mentioned the pivot and that is okay but there are a few that we have had much more success with.  

We will take the outside WR and tag &quot;follow&quot; which means he lines up 2 yards outside the inside WR off the ball with in the inside man on the LOS.  On the snap he runs inside #2 and climbs to 8 yards.  This allows the C to cheat over the traffic.  When the WR sees the corner is getting threw the traffic he immediately cuts back under the smash to the sideline.  It&#039;s a pick but never called.

We couple that route and also run a mirrored smash/mesh look. Run it from ACE.  Same alignment as above.  Outside players will run mesh.  If you have run the above route the corner will hesitate waiting for you to come back to him.  T flares on either side.  Mesh WR on T side should try and run under the OLB.  If he can that should be the QBs first read because T will be wide open in the flat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We if we know it is man we like to tag routes by the outside guys.  One other poster mentioned the pivot and that is okay but there are a few that we have had much more success with.  </p>
<p>We will take the outside WR and tag &#8220;follow&#8221; which means he lines up 2 yards outside the inside WR off the ball with in the inside man on the LOS.  On the snap he runs inside #2 and climbs to 8 yards.  This allows the C to cheat over the traffic.  When the WR sees the corner is getting threw the traffic he immediately cuts back under the smash to the sideline.  It&#8217;s a pick but never called.</p>
<p>We couple that route and also run a mirrored smash/mesh look. Run it from ACE.  Same alignment as above.  Outside players will run mesh.  If you have run the above route the corner will hesitate waiting for you to come back to him.  T flares on either side.  Mesh WR on T side should try and run under the OLB.  If he can that should be the QBs first read because T will be wide open in the flat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Understanding the Urban Meyer/University of Florida Offense &#171; Understanding The Trickeration</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/passing/the-smash-route-against-man/comment-page-1#comment-8197</link>
		<dc:creator>Understanding the Urban Meyer/University of Florida Offense &#171; Understanding The Trickeration</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 22:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=645#comment-8197</guid>
		<description>[...] In this article Chris Brown breaks down how to use the Smash concept against man coverage: http://smartfootball.com/passing/the-smash-route-against-man [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In this article Chris Brown breaks down how to use the Smash concept against man coverage: <a href="http://smartfootball.com/passing/the-smash-route-against-man" rel="nofollow">http://smartfootball.com/passing/the-smash-route-against-man</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smash &#171; Understanding The Trickeration</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/passing/the-smash-route-against-man/comment-page-1#comment-7812</link>
		<dc:creator>Smash &#171; Understanding The Trickeration</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 08:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=645#comment-7812</guid>
		<description>[...] In this article Chris Brown breaks down how to use the Smash concept against man coverage: http://smartfootball.com/passing/the-smash-route-against-man [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In this article Chris Brown breaks down how to use the Smash concept against man coverage: <a href="http://smartfootball.com/passing/the-smash-route-against-man" rel="nofollow">http://smartfootball.com/passing/the-smash-route-against-man</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheesehead TV Matchup: Week 9 Offense &#124; Cheesehead TV</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/passing/the-smash-route-against-man/comment-page-1#comment-2190</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheesehead TV Matchup: Week 9 Offense &#124; Cheesehead TV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=645#comment-2190</guid>
		<description>[...] Driver should find ample opportunities to work short, underneath routes this week, especially the smash. Really, it should be a clinic on Sunday &#8211; as poor as you might have thought the Bates scheme [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Driver should find ample opportunities to work short, underneath routes this week, especially the smash. Really, it should be a clinic on Sunday &#8211; as poor as you might have thought the Bates scheme [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Z</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/passing/the-smash-route-against-man/comment-page-1#comment-2162</link>
		<dc:creator>John Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=645#comment-2162</guid>
		<description>Against man coverage, the outside WR runs an angle-in, pivot back out to the flat route.  Only against zone coverage does the WR run a hitch route automatically.  By running this route against man, the WR has some chance of getting open and being an outlet if need be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Against man coverage, the outside WR runs an angle-in, pivot back out to the flat route.  Only against zone coverage does the WR run a hitch route automatically.  By running this route against man, the WR has some chance of getting open and being an outlet if need be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jgordon1</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/passing/the-smash-route-against-man/comment-page-1#comment-2149</link>
		<dc:creator>jgordon1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=645#comment-2149</guid>
		<description>as Chris said..the route must be presice and the throw accruate..another reason why teams play inside leverage is to have the ball thrown wide , with air and outside...We are only shown the successful routes...How many smash routes were incomplete in those games?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as Chris said..the route must be presice and the throw accruate..another reason why teams play inside leverage is to have the ball thrown wide , with air and outside&#8230;We are only shown the successful routes&#8230;How many smash routes were incomplete in those games?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/passing/the-smash-route-against-man/comment-page-1#comment-2143</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 08:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=645#comment-2143</guid>
		<description>sorry last comment was not complete. Free safety can play over the top on the post with Mike support underneath and help on the long ball to the single receiver side.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry last comment was not complete. Free safety can play over the top on the post with Mike support underneath and help on the long ball to the single receiver side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/passing/the-smash-route-against-man/comment-page-1#comment-2142</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 08:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=645#comment-2142</guid>
		<description>Cover two vs Trips rotae the free safety alignment to the MOF then you have Cover two to the Trips side with Cover 1 to the weak Side.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cover two vs Trips rotae the free safety alignment to the MOF then you have Cover two to the Trips side with Cover 1 to the weak Side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve sharik</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/passing/the-smash-route-against-man/comment-page-1#comment-2140</link>
		<dc:creator>steve sharik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 06:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=645#comment-2140</guid>
		<description>&quot;One reason for this is because many defenses who play man coverage use inside leverage to take away the quick slant passes that can gash them for big plays and are easy throws.&quot;  

This is why Greg Brown, among others, plays cover 1 (aka man-free) with corners in inside or outside leverage depending on the split of the WR.  So, in the case explained above, for example, Stevie Brown would&#039;ve been aligned in outside leverage.  Yes, the slant is available, but with a MOF safety, it isn&#039;t a TD.  

You may be wondering, &quot;What if it&#039;s cover 0 (i.e., no safety help)?&quot;  All defenders use inside leverage.  Yes, Stevie Brown would&#039;ve been susceptible to the corner route, but if the D is playing cover 0, they should be sending enough blitzers that the QB doesn&#039;t have time to take a 5-7 step drop and throw a corner route.  If he does, then the coverage scheme isn&#039;t the problem; poor timing and/or poor gap responsibility by the blitzers is to blame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;One reason for this is because many defenses who play man coverage use inside leverage to take away the quick slant passes that can gash them for big plays and are easy throws.&#8221;  </p>
<p>This is why Greg Brown, among others, plays cover 1 (aka man-free) with corners in inside or outside leverage depending on the split of the WR.  So, in the case explained above, for example, Stevie Brown would&#8217;ve been aligned in outside leverage.  Yes, the slant is available, but with a MOF safety, it isn&#8217;t a TD.  </p>
<p>You may be wondering, &#8220;What if it&#8217;s cover 0 (i.e., no safety help)?&#8221;  All defenders use inside leverage.  Yes, Stevie Brown would&#8217;ve been susceptible to the corner route, but if the D is playing cover 0, they should be sending enough blitzers that the QB doesn&#8217;t have time to take a 5-7 step drop and throw a corner route.  If he does, then the coverage scheme isn&#8217;t the problem; poor timing and/or poor gap responsibility by the blitzers is to blame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason A. Staples</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/passing/the-smash-route-against-man/comment-page-1#comment-2138</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason A. Staples</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 02:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=645#comment-2138</guid>
		<description>With as much man-free as FSU plays, I&#039;d be surprised if Clemson didn&#039;t run smash a good bit with Jacoby Ford in the slot. Clemson has put their fastest receiver in the slot for years against FSU, who nearly always puts a much slower safety one-on-one against a burner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With as much man-free as FSU plays, I&#8217;d be surprised if Clemson didn&#8217;t run smash a good bit with Jacoby Ford in the slot. Clemson has put their fastest receiver in the slot for years against FSU, who nearly always puts a much slower safety one-on-one against a burner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.328 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-08 17:25:23 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
