
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Smart Notes 1/18/2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://smartfootball.com/notes/smart-notes-1182010/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://smartfootball.com/notes/smart-notes-1182010</link>
	<description>Analysis and strategy by Chris.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:51:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr.Murder</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/notes/smart-notes-1182010/comment-page-1#comment-4638</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr.Murder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 01:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=798#comment-4638</guid>
		<description>Okay, back tot he loping motion. Billick coached DCulpp and he was notorious for doing this. So much for his coaching it out of a player, rather than pointing it out.

Those Gator practice jerseys looked like Phins gear to me. Lighter, to prevent heat issues on practice? That is a extremely important to me, it may well be an improved way of managing heat issues in practice.

One reason Tebow can use the extra time is that his ability to play in space and strand unblocked defender buys him the extra step. He&#039;s usually facing one less pass defender because no matter the front, he commands the attention of others in run force assignments.


IMO Tebow lacks the square stance for reading coverage, this gives DB the hint where you read or will go. You have to keep the shoulders square or people will jump routes the direction you aim. The delivery issue is in the wind up, the actual release looks pretty decent and powerful, if you can get to the point the football is its highest you see pretty good mechanics. Get from that point and work back, keep the ball cradled with elbow bend so you cut the wind up in half. Now you&#039;re moving forward with the ball in position.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, back tot he loping motion. Billick coached DCulpp and he was notorious for doing this. So much for his coaching it out of a player, rather than pointing it out.</p>
<p>Those Gator practice jerseys looked like Phins gear to me. Lighter, to prevent heat issues on practice? That is a extremely important to me, it may well be an improved way of managing heat issues in practice.</p>
<p>One reason Tebow can use the extra time is that his ability to play in space and strand unblocked defender buys him the extra step. He&#8217;s usually facing one less pass defender because no matter the front, he commands the attention of others in run force assignments.</p>
<p>IMO Tebow lacks the square stance for reading coverage, this gives DB the hint where you read or will go. You have to keep the shoulders square or people will jump routes the direction you aim. The delivery issue is in the wind up, the actual release looks pretty decent and powerful, if you can get to the point the football is its highest you see pretty good mechanics. Get from that point and work back, keep the ball cradled with elbow bend so you cut the wind up in half. Now you&#8217;re moving forward with the ball in position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr.Murder</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/notes/smart-notes-1182010/comment-page-1#comment-4634</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr.Murder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 00:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=798#comment-4634</guid>
		<description>Woodstrock* my apology. Their other Qb had that number, but both appear to be right handed in google cache pics...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woodstrock* my apology. Their other Qb had that number, but both appear to be right handed in google cache pics&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr.Murder</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/notes/smart-notes-1182010/comment-page-1#comment-4633</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr.Murder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 00:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=798#comment-4633</guid>
		<description>Marino wasn&#039;t a lefty, that&#039;s David Woodely footage?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marino wasn&#8217;t a lefty, that&#8217;s David Woodely footage?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ty</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/notes/smart-notes-1182010/comment-page-1#comment-4559</link>
		<dc:creator>Ty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=798#comment-4559</guid>
		<description>I found this same thing when doing my OC vs. DC historical analyses for Lions&#039; opponents.  Time and again, I&#039;d see a &#039;good run team&#039; going up against a &#039;bad run defense&#039; and see the opposite effect of the one expected: lower-than-average YpC, higher-than-average YpA.  Defensive coordinators appeared to be stacking to stop what the opponent was good at, only to have the other dimension of the offense pop up to take advantage I called it the &quot;Whack-a-Mole&quot; effect.  Just as theorized here, overall offensive production still fell into expected ranges.

http://www.thelionsinwinter.com/2009/11/watchtower-lions-at-vikings-ii.html

&quot;Interestingly, this run/pass effectiveness reversal seems to happen a lot.  Might it be because defenses load up to stop where teams are strong, and then the offense outperforms expectations the other way?  Figuring out if this is a statistically quantifiable phenomenon might make for an interesting offseason project.  Either way, this run/pass Whack-a-Mole effect produced the projected final results: a regrettably foreseeable, no-less-heartbreaking loss.&quot;

Peace
Ty</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found this same thing when doing my OC vs. DC historical analyses for Lions&#8217; opponents.  Time and again, I&#8217;d see a &#8216;good run team&#8217; going up against a &#8216;bad run defense&#8217; and see the opposite effect of the one expected: lower-than-average YpC, higher-than-average YpA.  Defensive coordinators appeared to be stacking to stop what the opponent was good at, only to have the other dimension of the offense pop up to take advantage I called it the &#8220;Whack-a-Mole&#8221; effect.  Just as theorized here, overall offensive production still fell into expected ranges.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thelionsinwinter.com/2009/11/watchtower-lions-at-vikings-ii.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.thelionsinwinter.com/2009/11/watchtower-lions-at-vikings-ii.html</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Interestingly, this run/pass effectiveness reversal seems to happen a lot.  Might it be because defenses load up to stop where teams are strong, and then the offense outperforms expectations the other way?  Figuring out if this is a statistically quantifiable phenomenon might make for an interesting offseason project.  Either way, this run/pass Whack-a-Mole effect produced the projected final results: a regrettably foreseeable, no-less-heartbreaking loss.&#8221;</p>
<p>Peace<br />
Ty</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dr</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/notes/smart-notes-1182010/comment-page-1#comment-4466</link>
		<dc:creator>dr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=798#comment-4466</guid>
		<description>Andy,
With all due respect, my argument is fact.  An embryo, fetus, or whatever you want to call it is a &quot;baby in waiting&quot;.  Ergo killing said organism removes the chance that said organism will be born and grow up.  Abortion is 100% effective at this.

Again, this is not an opinion about whether the baby has a soul or rights or anything else.  Abortions kill what will one day be a baby.

From what I understand, the commercial that Tebow is alleged to be in basically states that his mother was advised to terminate her pregnancy, but refused.  20 or so years later, a Heisman trophy was awarded to the fruit of her decision.  Whether or not Tim knew what was going on, had rights, a soul, or what not, an abortion would have erased everything.

Again, I am not sure where the controversy is.  Stating this is not threatening anybody&#039;s rights and it is not imposing a religious belief.  It may make some people that eagerly support abortions a bit queasy.  And if it does, it should.  Not everything that is legal should be applauded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy,<br />
With all due respect, my argument is fact.  An embryo, fetus, or whatever you want to call it is a &#8220;baby in waiting&#8221;.  Ergo killing said organism removes the chance that said organism will be born and grow up.  Abortion is 100% effective at this.</p>
<p>Again, this is not an opinion about whether the baby has a soul or rights or anything else.  Abortions kill what will one day be a baby.</p>
<p>From what I understand, the commercial that Tebow is alleged to be in basically states that his mother was advised to terminate her pregnancy, but refused.  20 or so years later, a Heisman trophy was awarded to the fruit of her decision.  Whether or not Tim knew what was going on, had rights, a soul, or what not, an abortion would have erased everything.</p>
<p>Again, I am not sure where the controversy is.  Stating this is not threatening anybody&#8217;s rights and it is not imposing a religious belief.  It may make some people that eagerly support abortions a bit queasy.  And if it does, it should.  Not everything that is legal should be applauded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/notes/smart-notes-1182010/comment-page-1#comment-4414</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 21:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=798#comment-4414</guid>
		<description>dr, you&#039;re making the same fundamental error that everybody on both sides of the abortion debate makes.  You&#039;re taking it as obvious and indisputable that you&#039;re right about the core issue: whether or not an embryo/fetus has personhood.

If &quot;person&quot; means &quot;entity in possession of a supernatural soul&quot; AND you believe the soul is imbued at the moment of conception then abortion (early- or late-term) is morally equivalent to murder.  If the soul is imbued at the moment of birth, or if &quot;person&quot; means &quot;autonomous entity&quot; then abortion (early- or late-term) is morally equivalent to contraception.  If &quot;person&quot; means &quot;entity capable of conscious thought&quot; then early-term abortion is morally equivalent to contraception and late-term abortion is a gray area, less moral than contraception but more moral than murder.

The fundamental issue can&#039;t be discussed without using words like &quot;personhood&quot; and &quot;soul,&quot; so you can&#039;t pretend it&#039;s not about religion.  Even in Tebow&#039;s situation, his religion is the sole and direct reason he sees a difference between the questions &quot;What if I had been aborted?&quot; and &quot;What if my father had had to work late the night I was conceived?&quot;  You&#039;re entitled to your opinion on abortion, and on the Tebow ad, but the idea that it&#039;s not a religious issue is simply and objectively false.

That said, I won&#039;t know how I feel about the Tebow ad until/unless I see it.  I&#039;m fine with anybody arguing for their beliefs so long as they make a coherent argument and show some respect for the people who disagree.  I&#039;m also fine with CBS choosing not to show the ad, so long as they consistently refuse all political and religious Super Bowl ads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dr, you&#8217;re making the same fundamental error that everybody on both sides of the abortion debate makes.  You&#8217;re taking it as obvious and indisputable that you&#8217;re right about the core issue: whether or not an embryo/fetus has personhood.</p>
<p>If &#8220;person&#8221; means &#8220;entity in possession of a supernatural soul&#8221; AND you believe the soul is imbued at the moment of conception then abortion (early- or late-term) is morally equivalent to murder.  If the soul is imbued at the moment of birth, or if &#8220;person&#8221; means &#8220;autonomous entity&#8221; then abortion (early- or late-term) is morally equivalent to contraception.  If &#8220;person&#8221; means &#8220;entity capable of conscious thought&#8221; then early-term abortion is morally equivalent to contraception and late-term abortion is a gray area, less moral than contraception but more moral than murder.</p>
<p>The fundamental issue can&#8217;t be discussed without using words like &#8220;personhood&#8221; and &#8220;soul,&#8221; so you can&#8217;t pretend it&#8217;s not about religion.  Even in Tebow&#8217;s situation, his religion is the sole and direct reason he sees a difference between the questions &#8220;What if I had been aborted?&#8221; and &#8220;What if my father had had to work late the night I was conceived?&#8221;  You&#8217;re entitled to your opinion on abortion, and on the Tebow ad, but the idea that it&#8217;s not a religious issue is simply and objectively false.</p>
<p>That said, I won&#8217;t know how I feel about the Tebow ad until/unless I see it.  I&#8217;m fine with anybody arguing for their beliefs so long as they make a coherent argument and show some respect for the people who disagree.  I&#8217;m also fine with CBS choosing not to show the ad, so long as they consistently refuse all political and religious Super Bowl ads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dr</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/notes/smart-notes-1182010/comment-page-1#comment-4394</link>
		<dc:creator>dr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 16:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=798#comment-4394</guid>
		<description>If some athletes out there were talking up Judaism, Islam, or some other religion in commercials, I probably would be annoyed.  All commercials annoy me (except for the funny Geico ones).

The on-field and interview gestures really do not bother me as my faith is strong enough to withstand somebody thanking Allah, Jesus, or Buddha for a victory.  These gestures merely just tell me more about the athlete as a person, which is the point of the interviews in the first place.  What were you expecting?  How many times has an athlete or coach talked about any meaningful strategy in an interview anyhow?  What were you expecting?

I don&#039;t see Tebow&#039;s anti-abortion ad as religious at all, and I am quite surprised that people might find it controversial.  If pro-abortion people do not realize that an abortion kills a baby, who will grow up and one day have opportunities...then they need to have their heads removed from their asses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If some athletes out there were talking up Judaism, Islam, or some other religion in commercials, I probably would be annoyed.  All commercials annoy me (except for the funny Geico ones).</p>
<p>The on-field and interview gestures really do not bother me as my faith is strong enough to withstand somebody thanking Allah, Jesus, or Buddha for a victory.  These gestures merely just tell me more about the athlete as a person, which is the point of the interviews in the first place.  What were you expecting?  How many times has an athlete or coach talked about any meaningful strategy in an interview anyhow?  What were you expecting?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see Tebow&#8217;s anti-abortion ad as religious at all, and I am quite surprised that people might find it controversial.  If pro-abortion people do not realize that an abortion kills a baby, who will grow up and one day have opportunities&#8230;then they need to have their heads removed from their asses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/notes/smart-notes-1182010/comment-page-1#comment-4330</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=798#comment-4330</guid>
		<description>actually I have it on very good authority that Scott Loeffler was told in no uncertain terms to leave Tebow&#039;s throwing motion alone, for fear of having him start thinking too much and doing more harm than good and hurt the team&#039;s chances of winning games.  Loeffler was in all actuality brought in for Johnny Brantley, not Tim Tebow.  

Regardless of Tim&#039;s motion, he still finished as the most efficient passer in NCAA history, and Meyer felt he was &quot;good enough&quot; for the college game and made the decision that Tim would stick with what got him there in order to give UF the best chance of repeating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>actually I have it on very good authority that Scott Loeffler was told in no uncertain terms to leave Tebow&#8217;s throwing motion alone, for fear of having him start thinking too much and doing more harm than good and hurt the team&#8217;s chances of winning games.  Loeffler was in all actuality brought in for Johnny Brantley, not Tim Tebow.  </p>
<p>Regardless of Tim&#8217;s motion, he still finished as the most efficient passer in NCAA history, and Meyer felt he was &#8220;good enough&#8221; for the college game and made the decision that Tim would stick with what got him there in order to give UF the best chance of repeating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brophy</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/notes/smart-notes-1182010/comment-page-1#comment-4268</link>
		<dc:creator>brophy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 18:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=798#comment-4268</guid>
		<description>yeah - I was just highlighting the obvious (hypocrisy)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah &#8211; I was just highlighting the obvious (hypocrisy)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Perry</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/notes/smart-notes-1182010/comment-page-1#comment-4245</link>
		<dc:creator>Perry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 21:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=798#comment-4245</guid>
		<description>Brophy,

I&#039;m pretty sure that a significant number of those who don&#039;t mind about Tebow and McCoy&#039;s expressiveness about their religion would be singing a different tune if they were shilling Islam or Krishna, but that&#039;s just the way the world works.  90% of the viewing audience is Christian (or at least would like to keep up the appearance of being so), so its largely a non-issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brophy,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure that a significant number of those who don&#8217;t mind about Tebow and McCoy&#8217;s expressiveness about their religion would be singing a different tune if they were shilling Islam or Krishna, but that&#8217;s just the way the world works.  90% of the viewing audience is Christian (or at least would like to keep up the appearance of being so), so its largely a non-issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.275 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-08 16:59:26 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
