<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Smart Links 11/19/2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://smartfootball.com/notes/smart-links-11192009/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://smartfootball.com/notes/smart-links-11192009</link>
	<description>Analysis and strategy by Chris.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 09:55:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Topher</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/notes/smart-links-11192009/comment-page-1#comment-2603</link>
		<dc:creator>Topher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=712#comment-2603</guid>
		<description>I opened IE today and saw that MSN.com has plastered Belichick&#039;s picture on a feature called &quot;NFL&#039;s 10 Worst Coaching Calls.&quot;

I don&#039;t really care if MSN&#039;s experts (whoever they are) agree or disagree with the call. Reasonable coaches will make different decisions on the field. It was a high-stakes call with big implications. But as has been consensued on this blog and comment space, there&#039;s no justification for even suggesting it&#039;s one of the &quot;NFL&#039;s 10 Worst Coaching Calls.&quot; 

This is silly, puffed-up media posturing. Most of them have understandably never liked Belichick, but given last year&#039;s surprising season they couldn&#039;t rip him after Brady got hurt. Now they have their first ammunition since Spygate to take out their acrimony in columns and features.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I opened IE today and saw that MSN.com has plastered Belichick&#8217;s picture on a feature called &#8220;NFL&#8217;s 10 Worst Coaching Calls.&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t really care if MSN&#8217;s experts (whoever they are) agree or disagree with the call. Reasonable coaches will make different decisions on the field. It was a high-stakes call with big implications. But as has been consensued on this blog and comment space, there&#8217;s no justification for even suggesting it&#8217;s one of the &#8220;NFL&#8217;s 10 Worst Coaching Calls.&#8221; </p>
<p>This is silly, puffed-up media posturing. Most of them have understandably never liked Belichick, but given last year&#8217;s surprising season they couldn&#8217;t rip him after Brady got hurt. Now they have their first ammunition since Spygate to take out their acrimony in columns and features.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/notes/smart-links-11192009/comment-page-1#comment-2600</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=712#comment-2600</guid>
		<description>Wow, Mangino is a prick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, Mangino is a prick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Another David</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/notes/smart-links-11192009/comment-page-1#comment-2588</link>
		<dc:creator>Another David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=712#comment-2588</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link, I really appreciate it! Us geeks need emboldening every once in a while</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link, I really appreciate it! Us geeks need emboldening every once in a while</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
