
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TCU&#8217;s inverted veer option</title>
	<atom:link href="http://smartfootball.com/defending-spread/tcus-inverted-veer-option/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://smartfootball.com/defending-spread/tcus-inverted-veer-option</link>
	<description>Analysis and strategy by Chris.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:36:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lebbeus Lam</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/defending-spread/tcus-inverted-veer-option/comment-page-1#comment-109719</link>
		<dc:creator>Lebbeus Lam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 13:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=500#comment-109719</guid>
		<description> May I ask what&#039;s the difference between Midline option and the inverted veer? And how many option style out there?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May I ask what&#8217;s the difference between Midline option and the inverted veer? And how many option style out there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raustin84</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/defending-spread/tcus-inverted-veer-option/comment-page-1#comment-109331</link>
		<dc:creator>Raustin84</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 14:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=500#comment-109331</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s a QB power play off of sweep action.  The pulling BSG, wrapping in the hole, makes it QB power.  The play side DE is your read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s a QB power play off of sweep action.  The pulling BSG, wrapping in the hole, makes it QB power.  The play side DE is your read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JOE B</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/defending-spread/tcus-inverted-veer-option/comment-page-1#comment-45333</link>
		<dc:creator>JOE B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 16:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=500#comment-45333</guid>
		<description>Daniel,
You can do a ton of stuff off this basic concept. You can use the Y as a pitch man, you can have him run the Bubble, you can go from single back and orbit motion the back side receiver and option off the OB. Think of all the things you can do on the back-side of the Zone Read and run them on the front side. 

This concept is also really effective out of the Pistol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel,<br />
You can do a ton of stuff off this basic concept. You can use the Y as a pitch man, you can have him run the Bubble, you can go from single back and orbit motion the back side receiver and option off the OB. Think of all the things you can do on the back-side of the Zone Read and run them on the front side. </p>
<p>This concept is also really effective out of the Pistol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Tyler</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/defending-spread/tcus-inverted-veer-option/comment-page-1#comment-29386</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Oct 2010 00:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=500#comment-29386</guid>
		<description>http://yfrog.com/mwinvertedzonereadj

thats kind of the basic idea of what im trying to say. Im not good at diagraming things on the computer and tinkering with the blocking, so i just changed up something i found on scribd</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://yfrog.com/mwinvertedzonereadj" rel="nofollow">http://yfrog.com/mwinvertedzonereadj</a></p>
<p>thats kind of the basic idea of what im trying to say. Im not good at diagraming things on the computer and tinkering with the blocking, so i just changed up something i found on scribd</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daniel tyler</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/defending-spread/tcus-inverted-veer-option/comment-page-1#comment-29321</link>
		<dc:creator>daniel tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 16:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=500#comment-29321</guid>
		<description>Okay this might sound like a dumb question, but is there add another wrinkle into this and make it triple option? Would this be effective?

If you hand off to the back, what if he were to take an angle not as wide, but still to the corner and have the slot receiver go backwards and become the pitchman. Maybe I will have to diagram it to show you what I am talking about. If it is truly inverted zone read, and the qb and rb change the roles, have the qb read the elmos on whether to hand it off or go up the middle, if he hands it off, have the runningback make the next read. 

This way, you could have triple option football originally lined up with an empty backfield, with the qb as the up the middle threat.

Id like to hear someone else&#039;s opinion on this</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay this might sound like a dumb question, but is there add another wrinkle into this and make it triple option? Would this be effective?</p>
<p>If you hand off to the back, what if he were to take an angle not as wide, but still to the corner and have the slot receiver go backwards and become the pitchman. Maybe I will have to diagram it to show you what I am talking about. If it is truly inverted zone read, and the qb and rb change the roles, have the qb read the elmos on whether to hand it off or go up the middle, if he hands it off, have the runningback make the next read. </p>
<p>This way, you could have triple option football originally lined up with an empty backfield, with the qb as the up the middle threat.</p>
<p>Id like to hear someone else&#8217;s opinion on this</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tog</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/defending-spread/tcus-inverted-veer-option/comment-page-1#comment-12587</link>
		<dc:creator>tog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 15:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=500#comment-12587</guid>
		<description>Chris, I have been toying with the dash and flash ideas and adding them to other things like power-where the read is now what did the kickout look like? did it get dug out? then give to the dash/flash guy, is there a good kickout? then qb undercut.  It kind of turns it into a variation of the old counteroption, at least in my mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, I have been toying with the dash and flash ideas and adding them to other things like power-where the read is now what did the kickout look like? did it get dug out? then give to the dash/flash guy, is there a good kickout? then qb undercut.  It kind of turns it into a variation of the old counteroption, at least in my mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adding a Wrinkle: Understanding the Wildcat &#38; Wild Horses &#171; Understanding The Trickeration</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/defending-spread/tcus-inverted-veer-option/comment-page-1#comment-8584</link>
		<dc:creator>Adding a Wrinkle: Understanding the Wildcat &#38; Wild Horses &#171; Understanding The Trickeration</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 04:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=500#comment-8584</guid>
		<description>[...] The above diagram is from Chris Brown at Smart Football. (http://smartfootball.com/defending-spread/tcus-inverted-veer-option) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The above diagram is from Chris Brown at Smart Football. (<a href="http://smartfootball.com/defending-spread/tcus-inverted-veer-option" rel="nofollow">http://smartfootball.com/defending-spread/tcus-inverted-veer-option</a>) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryon Califf</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/defending-spread/tcus-inverted-veer-option/comment-page-1#comment-6925</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryon Califf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 21:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=500#comment-6925</guid>
		<description>First, since my skin is fair and sensitive.   I was afraid of I  couldn&#039;t work. But the issues withover scrubbed is not exist. I am really pleased about results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, since my skin is fair and sensitive.   I was afraid of I  couldn&#8217;t work. But the issues withover scrubbed is not exist. I am really pleased about results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Echo Hlavac</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/defending-spread/tcus-inverted-veer-option/comment-page-1#comment-5839</link>
		<dc:creator>Echo Hlavac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 14:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=500#comment-5839</guid>
		<description>[..] A little unrelated, but I really liked this webpage post [..]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[..] A little unrelated, but I really liked this webpage post [..]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sparkey</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/defending-spread/tcus-inverted-veer-option/comment-page-1#comment-5094</link>
		<dc:creator>sparkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 20:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=500#comment-5094</guid>
		<description>What is meant by the term &quot;sidecar?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is meant by the term &#8220;sidecar?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.269 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-07 05:06:29 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
