<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Smart Football &#187; passing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://smartfootball.com/category/passing/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://smartfootball.com</link>
	<description>Analysis and strategy by Chris.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 11:32:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Tressel&#8217;s new calling: Ball control . . . passing?</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/passing/tressels-new-calling-ball-control-passing</link>
		<comments>http://smartfootball.com/passing/tressels-new-calling-ball-control-passing#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[passing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beaters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jim tressel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ohio state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[packaging concepts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quarterbacking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Buckeye Football Analysis recently broke down Ohio State&#8217;s tactics in their Rose Bowl win over Oregon. The verdict? The Tresseller rose above his reputation as football dinosaur and outschemed famed schemer, Chip Kelly. Specifically, Tressel channeled his inner Bill Walsh by having Pryor use a lot of ball control passes, including one play Buckeye Football [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://smartfootball.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/tresselpryor.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-835 alignright" style="margin: 4px;" title="tresselpryor" src="http://smartfootball.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/tresselpryor.jpg" alt="" width="279" height="300" /></a><span class="capital">B</span>uckeye Football Analysis recently <a href="http://buckeyefootballanalysis.blogspot.com/2010/01/rose-bowl-review-ohio-states-offense.html">broke down Ohio State&#8217;s tactics in their Rose Bowl win over Oregon</a>. The verdict? The Tresseller rose above <a href="http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/blog/dr_saturday/post/Deconstructing-The-grisly-demise-of-Tressel-Ba?urn=ncaaf,189322">his reputation as football dinosaur</a> and outschemed famed schemer, Chip Kelly. Specifically, Tressel channeled his inner Bill Walsh by having Pryor use a lot of ball control passes, including <a href="http://buckeyefootballanalysis.blogspot.com/2010/01/rose-bowl-review-ohio-states-offense.html">one play Buckeye Football Analysis highlighted in particular,</a> namely a packaged combination of &#8220;snag&#8221; to one side and &#8220;double-slants&#8221; to the other.</p>
<p>&#8220;<a href="http://smartfootball.blogspot.com/2006/05/packaging-concepts-putting-beaters-to.html">Packaged concepts</a>&#8221; refers to the fact that Tressel has put <a href="http://smartfootball.blogspot.com/2006/05/packaging-concepts-putting-beaters-to.html">different route combinations to either side</a>: To the left he has put the <a href="http://smartfootball.blogspot.com/2006/05/packaging-concepts-putting-beaters-to.html">double-slant</a> combination, while to the right he has the <a href="http://fifthdown.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/08/28/smart-football-with-chris-brown-a-look-at-steelers-strategy/">snag combo</a>. As <a href="http://buckeyefootballanalysis.blogspot.com/2010/01/rose-bowl-review-ohio-states-offense.html">BFA points out</a>: &#8220;First, it was part of the quick passing game so it allowed Pryor to throw before the blitz came.  Second, putting these routes to each side actually provided three coverage beaters.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://smartfootball.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/PRYORsnag.gif"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-832" title="PRYORsnag" src="http://smartfootball.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/PRYORsnag-300x162.gif" alt="" width="300" height="162" /></a></p>
<p>One of these was a simple man-blitz beater in the slants: If Oregon blitzed and played man, Pryor could immediately throw the slant. Indeed, he could do this against regular man coverage too, as he did in the clip below.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/-6KA8x5zUSw&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en_US&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/-6KA8x5zUSw&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en_US&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>Against zones, Pryor had a few options. One was to simply hit the slants again if that&#8217;s what the defense gave him by its alignment. He does this effectively below:</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/rY1SvEMlGP0&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en_US&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/rY1SvEMlGP0&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en_US&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>Another would be to work the &#8220;snag&#8221; combo. The snag is a variant of the <a href="http://smartfootball.blogspot.com/2008/01/divide-route-in-multiple-smash-concept.html">smash</a>, where one point is to get a high-low with the corner route and the flat route (except now the flat is controlled by the runningback), with the added dimension of an outside receiver running the &#8220;snag&#8221; route &#8212; a one-step slant where he settles inside at 5-6 yards. This gives you a &#8220;triangle&#8221; stretch, where you have both a high/low read (corner to RB in the flat) and a horizontal read from inside to outside (snag route to the RB in the flat).</p>
<p>And the best part for Pryor is that these are all quick, immediate routes that (a) give him options against the blitz, and (b) provide controlled passes against zones too as the receivers settle in the voids. I don&#8217;t have any video of OSU throwing the snag side, but <a href="http://fifthdown.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/08/28/smart-football-with-chris-brown-a-look-at-steelers-strategy/">here is an example of the Steelers using the play to win the Super Bowl</a>, and some <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=airraid+info&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;aq=t&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;client=firefox-a">Airraid/Mike Leach</a> based <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V0ex5fYKdJI">cut-ups of their snag play, Y-corner</a> (which is actually basically the same, with snag to one side and a form of double-slants to the other).</p>
<p><strong>So the final question is</strong>, how does Pryor read this and know where to go? I don&#8217;t know what keys Tressel is giving Pryor, so I can only say how I would teach it. Note that both the snag combo and the double slants are both designed to attack either (a) man coverage or (b) two-deep zones, so the main key you&#8217;d give your quarterback &#8212; go one way if there is one deep safety or another if there are two &#8212; is out. This doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s poorly designed, it&#8217;s just a different goal. (This is how most pro teams package snag as well.) Instead you probably give the quarterback a pre-snap key along the lines of: &#8220;go to the snag side <em>unless&#8230;</em>,&#8221; where the unless includes (1) a man-blitz or other man coverage where you have a good matchup (see the first video), or where the defense is just giving you the slant by alignment (the second video). From there the QB can make a judgment on whether he likes the snag or the slants based on the alignment of the linebackers, cornerbacks, and safeties. Another possibility, though one I probably wouldn&#8217;t use, would be to read the middle linebacker and choose whether to go to the snag side or the double slant side based on where he went. That would give you a good key on those two routes, but I wouldn&#8217;t use it because it doesn&#8217;t tell you much about the corner/flat combo or the outside slant to the other side.</p>
<p>Two final thoughts. One, unless it is a blitz and the quarterback can&#8217;t get it out (hence the slants), the snag is the more versatile combo as, even if the defense is in a three-deep type coverage, the &#8220;snag&#8221; receiver can usually find an open spot and get you five to six yards as an outlet. And, finally, there is a final advanced technique you could use that I plan on expanding on in the future. It is the packaged three-step and five-step combination. Basically, you put a three step drop combo to one side with a five-step to the other. The QB can look to the three step side first &#8212; which should be open versus a particular coverage as well as a blitz, as sort of an automatic hot route &#8212; then, if that&#8217;s not there, the quarterback would reset his feet for depth and swing his eyes to look for the five-step combo; here, the snag (though whether snag is three-step or five-step depends on what depth you run the receivers&#8217; routes at). In the future I will talk about how to package this and even let the quarterback pick the three-step combination at the line.</p>
<p>But that is all for a later post. For now, <em>viva la Tresselball</em>.
<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsmartfootball.com%2Fpassing%2Ftressels-new-calling-ball-control-passing"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsmartfootball.com%2Fpassing%2Ftressels-new-calling-ball-control-passing&amp;source=smartfootball&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://smartfootball.com/passing/tressels-new-calling-ball-control-passing/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>That&#8217;s what I call a shootout</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/passing/thats-what-i-call-a-shootout</link>
		<comments>http://smartfootball.com/passing/thats-what-i-call-a-shootout#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[passing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quarterbacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[run and shoot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spread]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in 1990 &#8212; before the spread offense had been invented, so we&#8217;re told &#8212; Houston beat TCU 56-35 in one of the greatest aerial duels of all time. TCU&#8217;s quarterback, Matt Vogler, threw for 690 yards and five touchdowns on 44 of 79 passes. Houston&#8217;s David Klingler countered with 563 yards and seven touchdowns [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="capital">B</span>ack in 1990 &#8212; before the spread offense had been invented, so we&#8217;re told &#8212; Houston beat TCU 56-35 in one of the greatest aerial duels of all time. TCU&#8217;s quarterback, Matt Vogler, threw for 690 yards and five touchdowns on 44 of 79 passes. Houston&#8217;s David Klingler countered with 563 yards and seven touchdowns on 36 of 53 passing (with four interceptions). Of course, Klingler was running John Jenkins&#8217;s brand of the <a href="http://smartfootball.blogspot.com/search/label/run%20and%20shoot">run and shoot</a>. Below are the scoring drives from the first half (<a href="http://footballmastery.wordpress.com/2010/02/22/tcu-vs-houston-1990/">hat tip</a> to Football Mastery for the vids):</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/l6YOodUP98U&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/l6YOodUP98U&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p>See below the jump for the second half clips:<br />
<span id="more-817"></span></p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Sval63dOamU&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Sval63dOamU&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsmartfootball.com%2Fpassing%2Fthats-what-i-call-a-shootout"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsmartfootball.com%2Fpassing%2Fthats-what-i-call-a-shootout&amp;source=smartfootball&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://smartfootball.com/passing/thats-what-i-call-a-shootout/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Montana Magic</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/passing/montana-magic</link>
		<comments>http://smartfootball.com/passing/montana-magic#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 14:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[passing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill walsh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[football history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joe montana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passing game]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quarterbacking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stumbled across these great videos of Joe Montana, grand executor of Bill Walsh&#8217;s precision offense. There are many great things to notice from these clips, but in particularly focus on Montana&#8217;s footwork. This is one area where quarterbacks as a whole have regressed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="capital">S</span>tumbled across these great videos of Joe Montana, grand executor of <a href="http://smartfootball.blogspot.com/2009/04/bill-walshs-49ers-notes-on-dropback.html">Bill Walsh&#8217;s precision offense</a>. There are many great things to notice from these clips, but in particularly focus on Montana&#8217;s footwork. This is one area where quarterbacks as a whole have regressed. </p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/MVjTlVcB1AQ&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/MVjTlVcB1AQ&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br />
<span id="more-796"></span><br />
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/BRwL1X73fr0&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/BRwL1X73fr0&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/II3251lzCBU&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/II3251lzCBU&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsmartfootball.com%2Fpassing%2Fmontana-magic"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsmartfootball.com%2Fpassing%2Fmontana-magic&amp;source=smartfootball&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://smartfootball.com/passing/montana-magic/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Houston and the &#8220;stick&#8221; passing concept</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/uncategorized/houston-running-the-stick-concept</link>
		<comments>http://smartfootball.com/uncategorized/houston-running-the-stick-concept#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passing game]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quarterbacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quick pass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[three step]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Stick&#8221; or &#8220;y-stick&#8221; is one of the most recent passing concepts to have gone totally viral such that basically every passing team uses it &#8212; it&#8217;s only about twenty to twenty-five years old. Everyone has their spin on the play, but basically it is a quick, three-step route play, where the offense puts the flat [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="capital">&</span>#8220;Stick&#8221; or &#8220;y-stick&#8221; is one of the most recent passing concepts to have gone totally viral such that basically every passing team uses it &#8212; it&#8217;s only about twenty to twenty-five years old. Everyone has their spin on the play, but basically it is a quick, three-step route play, where the offense puts the flat defender in a bind by sending one receiver to the flat while another hooks up or &#8220;sticks it&#8221; at five to six yards. Below is a good video showing the concept and showing an example of the Houston Cougars running it.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/IzsyPxTdQD0&#038;color1=0xb1b1b1&#038;color2=0xcfcfcf&#038;hl=en_US&#038;feature=player_embedded&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/IzsyPxTdQD0&#038;color1=0xb1b1b1&#038;color2=0xcfcfcf&#038;hl=en_US&#038;feature=player_embedded&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p>Note that it looks like Tulane is in man coverage, though it is the defensive end who drops off to cover the running back. In any event, stick also serves as a very good zone beater, as well being a great, quick zone play.
<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsmartfootball.com%2Funcategorized%2Fhouston-running-the-stick-concept"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsmartfootball.com%2Funcategorized%2Fhouston-running-the-stick-concept&amp;source=smartfootball&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://smartfootball.com/uncategorized/houston-running-the-stick-concept/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Good example of four verticals</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/passing/good-example-of-four-verticals</link>
		<comments>http://smartfootball.com/passing/good-example-of-four-verticals#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[passing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verticals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a bit old but it is a good example of the four verticals play: Against the Baltimore Ravens, Carson Palmer of the Cincinnati Bengals hit Andre Caldwell on the play. Baltimore was in two-deep man coverage, where they had two deep safeties and the other players were in man coverage. Indeed, four verticals [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="capital">T</span>his is a bit old but it is a good example of the four verticals play: Against the Baltimore Ravens, Carson Palmer of the Cincinnati Bengals hit Andre Caldwell on the play. Baltimore was in two-deep man coverage, where they had two deep safeties and the other players were in man coverage. Indeed, four verticals is not really a great play against this coverage, but Caldwell, whose job it was to &#8220;bend&#8221; inside the split safeties, beat his man and was therefore open. If you don&#8217;t remember the play, it was a game winner.</p>
<p><img src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_1PiTuBhELbU/ScJSCj2ys8I/AAAAAAAAAcw/NBAv5sTddwU/s320/1.gif" alt="four verts" /></p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/YqU-AP0avQs&#038;color1=0xb1b1b1&#038;color2=0xcfcfcf&#038;hl=en_US&#038;feature=player_embedded&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/YqU-AP0avQs&#038;color1=0xb1b1b1&#038;color2=0xcfcfcf&#038;hl=en_US&#038;feature=player_embedded&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsmartfootball.com%2Fpassing%2Fgood-example-of-four-verticals"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsmartfootball.com%2Fpassing%2Fgood-example-of-four-verticals&amp;source=smartfootball&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://smartfootball.com/passing/good-example-of-four-verticals/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The &#8220;smash&#8221; route against man coverage</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/passing/the-smash-route-against-man</link>
		<comments>http://smartfootball.com/passing/the-smash-route-against-man#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[passing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blitz beater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quarterbacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smash]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have previously discussed the smash concept, where an outside receiver runs a short flat or &#8220;hitch&#8221; route while an inside receiver breaks to the corner. The play works well against cover two zones in particular because it puts the cornerback in a bind: if he plays the man in front of him he opens [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="capital">I</span> have previously discussed the <a href="http://smartfootball.blogspot.com/2008/01/divide-route-in-multiple-smash-concept.html">smash concept,</a> where an outside receiver runs a short flat or &#8220;hitch&#8221; route while an inside receiver breaks to the corner. The play works well against cover two zones in particular because it puts the cornerback in a bind: if he plays the man in front of him he opens up a big are for the quarterback to throw the corner route behind him.</p>
<p><img src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_1PiTuBhELbU/R4VshWgkkII/AAAAAAAAADM/FoR0XAEKQ0U/s320/cover2-divide.gif" alt="smash" /></p>
<p>One reason this play is useful, however, is because it does more than attack this zone aspect. Again man-to-man coverage the corner route is a very good option &#8212; so long as the throw is precise and the route is good. One reason for this is because many defenses who play man coverage use inside leverage to take away the quick slant passes that can gash them for big plays and are easy throws.</p>
<p><img class="alignright" style="margin: 3px;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_1PiTuBhELbU/SLH6P28pWiI/AAAAAAAAAKA/FaWSaPf0k5k/s320/proRAT.gif" alt="Cover 1 Robber" width="320" height="141" />Moreover, many man defenses use a deep free-safety or an inside &#8220;floater&#8221; or &#8220;robber&#8221; player whose job is simply to read the quarterback&#8217;s eyes. The advantage of the corner route is that the throw is away from all these inside defenders who can gum up a normal &#8220;who has beaten his man&#8221; read.</p>
<p>Finally, the fact that it is the inside receiver rather than the outside one who runs the corner route can get the offense some favorable matchups: Most defenses put their cornerbacks in man coverage on the outside receivers; the inside receivers are thus often guarded by safeties or linebackers or substitute &#8220;nickel back&#8221; players.</p>
<p>All of these advantages were on display in Penn State&#8217;s game against Michigan, as the Nittany Lions scored on the same smash concept from the same formation against the same coverage (indeed, same receiver) twice. Below is a diagram of their play, followed by video, courtesy of <a href="http://mgoblog.com">mgoblog</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://smartfootball.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/1SMASHGIF.gif"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-646" title="1SMASHGIF" src="http://smartfootball.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/1SMASHGIF.gif" alt="1SMASHGIF" width="480" height="291" /></a></p>
<p>Below is the video:</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="560" height="340" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/DSb22XELBIc&amp;hl=en&amp;fmt=6" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="560" height="340" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/DSb22XELBIc&amp;hl=en&amp;fmt=6" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object>
<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsmartfootball.com%2Fpassing%2Fthe-smash-route-against-man"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsmartfootball.com%2Fpassing%2Fthe-smash-route-against-man&amp;source=smartfootball&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://smartfootball.com/passing/the-smash-route-against-man/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The slant concept: Iowa&#8217;s game winner</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/passing/the-slant-concept-iowas-game-winner</link>
		<comments>http://smartfootball.com/passing/the-slant-concept-iowas-game-winner#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[passing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blitz beater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kirk ferentz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passing concepts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Iowa, a team that seems to thrive on dramatic finishes, pulled off one of the biggest of Kirk Ferentz&#8217;s tenure last weekend against Michigan State, as Ricky Stanzi threw a touchdown pass as time expired for the Hawkeye victory. The play itself was as simple as it gets: The old slant/shoot combination, which dates back [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="capital">I</span>owa, a team that seems to thrive on dramatic finishes, pulled off one of the biggest of Kirk Ferentz&#8217;s tenure last weekend against Michigan State, as Ricky Stanzi threw a touchdown pass as time expired for the Hawkeye victory. The play itself was as simple as it gets: The old slant/shoot combination, which dates back <em>at least</em> as far back as Paul Brown&#8217;s teams. <a href="http://smartfootball.blogspot.com/2009/04/bill-walshs-49ers-notes-on-dropback.html">Bill Walsh of course made it even more famous</a>, as his receivers frequently caught slant passes and took them for long touchdowns.</p>
<div><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="512" height="322" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="AllowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><param name="flashVars" value="id=16290053&amp;vid=6277741&amp;lang=en-us&amp;intl=us&amp;thumbUrl=http%3A//l.yimg.com/a/p/i/bcst/videosearch/12114/95780926.jpeg&amp;embed=1" /><param name="src" value="http://d.yimg.com/static.video.yahoo.com/yep/YV_YEP.swf?ver=2.2.46" /><param name="flashvars" value="id=16290053&amp;vid=6277741&amp;lang=en-us&amp;intl=us&amp;thumbUrl=http%3A//l.yimg.com/a/p/i/bcst/videosearch/12114/95780926.jpeg&amp;embed=1" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="512" height="322" src="http://d.yimg.com/static.video.yahoo.com/yep/YV_YEP.swf?ver=2.2.46" flashvars="id=16290053&amp;vid=6277741&amp;lang=en-us&amp;intl=us&amp;thumbUrl=http%3A//l.yimg.com/a/p/i/bcst/videosearch/12114/95780926.jpeg&amp;embed=1" bgcolor="#000000" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>As you can see, it worked very well, as Michigan State played man coverage and went with an all-out blitz. Stanzi was able to deliver the ball before Michigan State&#8217;s unblocked defender (who came from Stanzi&#8217;s right) could get there. The slant&#8217;s quickness is one of its advantages.</p>
<p>In the play, Stanzi went to his single receiver &#8212; i.e. his split end &#8212; who had single, man coverage. But on the other side Iowa ran the same slant concept except with three receivers: The outermost guy ran a slant, the inside slot ran a slant as well, and the H-back, the innermost receiver, ran to the flat.</p>
<p><a href="http://smartfootball.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/iowaslant1.gif"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-627" title="iowaslant" src="http://smartfootball.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/iowaslant1.gif" alt="iowaslant" width="500" height="260" /></a></p>
<p>This leads to the other aspect of the play, the wrinkle that helped it succeed: The motion by the H-back/tight-end before the snap. He began on the left side of the formation and motioned across. Why was this relevant? Watch the clip above again. What did Michigan State do? A single defender followed the H-back across &#8212; a clear indicator that the defense was in man coverage. Knowing this, Stanzi knew that his backside receiver was one-on-one, and he went to him.</p>
<p>But what if they hadn&#8217;t reacted this way? Had Michigan State, rather than having a man follow the H-back instead &#8220;bumped across&#8221; so that a defender on the offense&#8217;s left merely repositioned slightly to account for the new receiver, this would have indicated that the play was zone. And unless the zone was very unbalanced to the single receiver, Stanzi would have no doubt looked to the three receiver side as a kind of flood for the zone. His read would have been the flat defender: if he widened for the tight-end in the flat, the slant should be open; if he hangs back then the tight-end ought to be open in the flat.</p>
<p>So Iowa won the game using one of the most basic plays in football, but they didn&#8217;t do it without a bit of knowledge about what they were getting into. Now, it bears noting that modern defenses can disguise their man or zone reactions to motion, but it remains a useful tool. It certainly was that for Iowa.</p>
<p>(H/t <a href="http://brophyfootball.blogspot.com">Brophy</a> for the video.)</div>
<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsmartfootball.com%2Fpassing%2Fthe-slant-concept-iowas-game-winner"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsmartfootball.com%2Fpassing%2Fthe-slant-concept-iowas-game-winner&amp;source=smartfootball&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://smartfootball.com/passing/the-slant-concept-iowas-game-winner/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Florida&#8217;s offense might evolve with John Brantley</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/passing/how-floridas-offense-might-evolve-with-john-brantley</link>
		<comments>http://smartfootball.com/passing/how-floridas-offense-might-evolve-with-john-brantley#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 18:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[passing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My analysis is available over at Dr Saturday. It includes an in-depth look at the &#8220;levels&#8221; concept against a couple of pass coverage, and hypothesizes how Florida might use a true pocket passer instead of the multi-talented Tim Tebow.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="capital">M</span>y <a href="http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/blog/dr_saturday/post/Deconstructing-How-Florida-tackles-Empty-Tebow-?urn=ncaaf,194833">analysis is available</a> over at <em>Dr Saturday</em>. It includes <a href="http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/blog/dr_saturday/post/Deconstructing-How-Florida-tackles-Empty-Tebow-?urn=ncaaf,194833">an in-depth</a> look at the &#8220;levels&#8221; concept against a couple of pass coverage, and hypothesizes how Florida might use a true pocket passer instead of the multi-talented Tim Tebow.
<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsmartfootball.com%2Fpassing%2Fhow-floridas-offense-might-evolve-with-john-brantley"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsmartfootball.com%2Fpassing%2Fhow-floridas-offense-might-evolve-with-john-brantley&amp;source=smartfootball&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://smartfootball.com/passing/how-floridas-offense-might-evolve-with-john-brantley/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Throwing a football while staring down a blitz</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/passing/throwing-a-football-while-staring-down-a-blitz</link>
		<comments>http://smartfootball.com/passing/throwing-a-football-while-staring-down-a-blitz#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[passing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[darin slack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dub maddox]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very good quarterbacking video from Dub Maddox of Jenks, OK, HS, and who helps run Darin Slack&#8217;s quarterback camps.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="capital">V</span>ery good quarterbacking video from Dub Maddox of Jenks, OK, HS, and who helps run <a href="http://www.quarterbackacademy.com/">Darin Slack&#8217;s quarterback camps</a>.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/g_3sIl8macc&#038;hl=en&#038;fmt=6"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/g_3sIl8macc&#038;hl=en&#038;fmt=6" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsmartfootball.com%2Fpassing%2Fthrowing-a-football-while-staring-down-a-blitz"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsmartfootball.com%2Fpassing%2Fthrowing-a-football-while-staring-down-a-blitz&amp;source=smartfootball&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://smartfootball.com/passing/throwing-a-football-while-staring-down-a-blitz/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Understanding coverages and attacking them with passing game</title>
		<link>http://smartfootball.com/passing/attacking-coverages-in-the-passing-game</link>
		<comments>http://smartfootball.com/passing/attacking-coverages-in-the-passing-game#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[passing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coverage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartfootball.com/?p=297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ed. Note: This was passed on to me by Bill Mountjoy, and some of the images are from Ron Jenkins. There are many qualities that a quarterback must possess. However, the most obvious is the QB’s ability to throw the football. Throwing the football requires a tremendous amount of coordination and teamwork for proper execution. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><span class="capital">E</span>d. Note: </em><em>This was passed on to me by Bill Mountjoy, and some of the images are from <a href="http://www.topgunqbacademy.com/">Ron Jenkins</a>.</em></p>
<p>There are many qualities that a quarterback must possess. However, the most obvious is the QB’s ability to throw the football. Throwing the football requires a tremendous amount of coordination and teamwork for proper execution. The QB can make up for some deficiencies with proper reads. Whether it is the Pre-Snap Read, Reading on the Move, or Adjustments in routes, the QB’s recognition, anticipation and reaction are based upon his knowledge of the offense as it relates to what he sees.</p>
<p><strong>Pre-snap read</strong><br />
The QB must make a &#8220;Pre-Snap Read&#8221; confirming the defensive secondary’s alignment. The PSR provides the QB with help in making the proper throwing decision; i.e., allows the QB to establish his thought process prior to the snap. There will be many times when the QB can determine what the coverage is before the snap. About eighty percent (80%) of the time the coverage will be given away by someone’s alignment in the secondary, typically the second defender inside. Even when the total coverage is not given away, through observation of particular alignments, you will be able to eliminate some coverages or narrow to a “Hard Focus” area. The QB must approach the LOS the same way every play and get his hands under the center. The PSR process includes a “Soft Gaze” left, middle and right. The purpose is to identify (1) the depth of the corners, (2) number of safeties, (3) weakside flat defender, and (4) the number of run defenders (“front”):</p>
<ul>
<li>Find the Free Safety (“FS”) and Strong Safety (“SS”) to determine the type of front – seven-man or eight-man. If the safeties adjust to motion, be aware of a possible blitz.</li>
<li>Find the weakside linebacker (Whip (“W”)). This is a crucial read to recognize an outside blitz. It is the QB’s responsibility to adjust the protection to handle the outside blitz or allow the receivers to read “HOT.”</li>
</ul>
<p>The PSR is only the first step in the throwing decision. The QB must identify the primary defender (the “Key”) to read (“Hard Focus”) and determine where to throw the ball. The Key is determined by the pattern and the related PSR. The ball is thrown based upon what the Key does within the QB’s line of sight. For example, on a strong side route the PSR must identify the SS. Upon the snap the strong safety can either man-up, cover the flat, cover deep third (1/3) or cover deep quarter (¼), and it is the SS’s action that allows the QB to decide where to throw the ball. Depending upon the route, the SS’s action might change the key (Reading on the Move [“ROM”]) to the Corner (“C”) or FS. The QB will make their throwing decision based upon what happens in his Hard Focus area and the related routes within the “line of sight”; i.e., does the Key rotate, invert or play man. When the QB keys defenders, not receivers, there are fewer throws into coverage.</p>
<p><strong>- Basic Coverages</strong><br />
A brief summary of coverages, including strengths, weakness, and how to attack them follows. The summaries include a place (“Patterns”) for the coach and QB to write in their specific routes to attack the coverages. These are the basic coverages: Invert (“sky”); Rotate (“cloud”); Two Deep, Man Under Two; Man with a Free; Man – Zero; Quarter, Quarter, Half; Zone Blitz; Robber; and Prevent.</p>
<p><strong>Three Deep &#8211; Invert (“Sky”)</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://smartfootball.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/cover3.gif"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-419" title="cover3" src="http://smartfootball.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/cover3.gif" alt="cover3" width="570" height="464" /></a><br />
The PSR is based on the alignment of SS and C on the strong side. Teams will typically define the TE as the strong side, however a scouting report will provide this information. If the SS is aligned with less depth than the C, the read is an invert by the SS; i.e., the SS is covering the flat, if a receiver is in the flat. Confirm 3D coverage by the alignment of the FS. If the FS is off the hash and favoring the middle, assume that it will be a 3D. Also the QB must be aware of the weak side, if the Weakside Linebacker (“W”) is in a stack (lined-up behind a defensive lineman or end) or walk (off the LOS outside the end) position, it denotes a soft corner, with W responsible for the weak flat. If the end (“E”) is up on the LOS or in a three (3) point stance, assume he will rush. If you are throwing to the strong side upon the snap you can determine whether E is coming or has curl or flat.</p>
<p><em>- Strengths</em></p>
<ol>
<li> Safe &#8211; always three deep</li>
<li>strong side force against the run</li>
<li>SS can get under an out and may be able to get under a stop or flat depending upon the wide receiver splits</li>
<li>can cover eight zones with a three man rush</li>
<li>can still bring four with strong side contain and have seven in coverage</li>
</ol>
<p><em>- Weaknesses </em></p>
<ol>
<li> Versus eight in coverage the defense can only rush three with five or more to block them</li>
<li>four defenders underneath to cover the six zones &#8211; large curl and horizontal seams</li>
<li>no leverage on wide receivers; i.e., cannot bump or push inside</li>
<li>possibly late to cover stop and flat, both weak and strong</li>
<li>cannot cover a strong side flood route (three or four receivers in the pattern) without E, then it is a three man rush</li>
<li>weak flat</li>
<li>weakside force</li>
</ol>
<p><em>- How to attack it:</em></p>
<ol>
<li>Stretch vertically and horizontally</li>
<li>plenty of pass protection</li>
<li>throw in the alley created by sending three on two in the perimeter (“flood type” routes)</li>
<li>weakside curl &amp; flat</li>
<li>sprint away from SS</li>
</ol>
<p><strong>Three Deep &#8211; Rotate (“Cloud”)</strong><br />
The goal of this coverage is to take away the short passing game or protect against the wide side of the field when the offensive formation is strong into the boundary (short side). The PSR is based on the alignment of the SS and the C. The SS must be deeper than normal in order to cover the deep middle or deep outside (is aligned deeper than the adjacent C), the read is a rotate by SS; i.e., SS is covering the deep middle or outside. Also, in this coverage the C to the side of the rotation will be tight (up close) on the wide receiver as they have the flat. The secondary can disguise this by having both Cs up and on the snap the away (from the rotation) C back peddles to deep third [1/3] quickly (“bails”). However, we can determine the side of the rotation by the position of the Outside Linebacker (“OLB”). The OLB, whether W or S away from the rotation must be stacked or walked off as they have flat away from the rotation. You can confirm the 3D by the alignment of the FS. If the FS is off the hash and favoring the middle, assume 3D.</p>
<p><em>- Strengths</em></p>
<ol>
<li>Safe &#8211; always three deep</li>
<li>force (to the rotation) against the run</li>
<li>leverage by the C (shut down weak flat or out)</li>
<li>can cover eight zones with a three man rush</li>
<li>can still bring four with force and contain to the rotation, and have seven (7) in coverage</li>
<li>easy to disguise<span id="more-297"></span></li>
</ol>
<p><em>- Weaknesses</em></p>
<ol>
<li> Versus eight in coverage the defense can only rush three with five or more to block them</li>
<li>only four defenders underneath to cover the six zones &#8211; large curl seams</li>
<li>cushion on the wide receiver away from the rotation</li>
<li>OLB is alone in the flat away from the rotation</li>
<li>cannot cover a flood route (three or four [3 or 4] receivers in the pattern) • force and contain away from rotation</li>
</ol>
<p><em>- How to attack it </em></p>
<ol>
<li> Flood routes &#8211; throw in the alley created by sending three on two in the perimeter (“flood type” routes)</li>
<li>plenty of pass protection</li>
<li>quick passes away from the rotation</li>
<li>run away from rotation</li>
<li>get TE involved</li>
</ol>
<p><strong>Two Deep &#8211; Five Under (Cover 2)</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://smartfootball.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/cover2.gif"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-420" title="cover2" src="http://smartfootball.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/cover2.gif" alt="cover2" width="575" height="435" /></a><br />
The PSR is based on the depth of the Cs and safeties. The Cs will usually be outside of the wide receivers and the safeties will be near the hash marks, aligned deeper than the corners. If the ball is on the hash, look to the strong side defensive back for their alignment because the safety will naturally be on the hash. If the end (“E”) drops to the curl, then all six (6) underneath zones are covered. When W has outside leverage on the second receiver, assume W has flat and rule out two (2) deep, five (5) under coverage and is possibly 3D rotation or Quarter-Quarter, Half.</p>
<p><em>- Strengths </em></p>
<ol>
<li> Strong versus run</li>
<li>leverage on both wide receivers</li>
<li>cover five (5) of the six (6) underneath zones</li>
<li>four (4) man rush</li>
<li>takes away the outs</li>
<li>can hold up the TE</li>
<li>weakside force and contain</li>
</ol>
<p><em>- Weaknesses</em></p>
<ol>
<li>Safeties must cover half (½) the field; i.e., the three (3) deep zones are covered by two</li>
<li>inside receiver down the middle</li>
<li>LBs must cover curl</li>
<li>strong side contain</li>
<li>weak inside linebacker to curl</li>
<li>wide splits can create lanes</li>
</ol>
<p><em>- How to attack it</em></p>
<ol>
<li>Use “Spread Formations” to horizontally stretch the safeties</li>
<li>vertically stretch the flats to create lanes</li>
<li>a natural hole twenty to twenty-five (20-25) yards along the sidelines</li>
<li>weakside curl</li>
<li>corner routes</li>
<li>flood type routes</li>
</ol>
<p><strong>Cover 2 Man / Man under two-deep</strong><br />
This coverage is man-to-man with help over the top in the two (2) deep zones. This coverage allows the defense to bracket or double two (2) receivers. The PSR is based on the alignment of the Cs on the wide receivers. If the safeties give a 2D look (safeties near the hash marks, aligned deeper than the C’s) and both C’s are up tighter or looking primarily at the receiver instead of the QB, then Man Under Coverage (“MUC”) is confirmed. The Cs are the primary key, as they will usually be head up or shaded to the outside of the wide receivers. Also, the undercover (LB’s) will be head-up or at least in position to cover their man. Motion will force the undercover to adjust or run with the receiver.</p>
<p><strong>Strengths</strong></p>
<ol>
<li>Double or bracket two receivers</li>
<li>four man rush</li>
<li>every potential receiver is accounted for (covered)</li>
<li>can bump because each defender has help over the top</li>
<li>excellent versus zone type routes or screens</li>
</ol>
<p><strong>Weaknesses</strong></p>
<ol>
<li>Poor run support</li>
<li>mismatch with the backs versus linebackers</li>
<li>hard to disguise versus motion</li>
<li>three (3) deep zones are not covered</li>
<li>one on one underneath</li>
<li>crossing routes</li>
<li>“bunch” and “snug” type sets</li>
</ol>
<p><em>- How to attack it</em></p>
<ol>
<li>Back routes on the linebackers</li>
<li>create mismatches with the TE running option (“read”) routes</li>
<li>stay shallow with routes, catch the ball short and run long</li>
<li>crossing routes (“mesh”) with the wide receivers</li>
<li>TE in the alley or fades to the wide receivers</li>
<li>running plays</li>
<li>use motion</li>
</ol>
<p><strong>Cover 1 man / Man-to-man with a free safety.</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://smartfootball.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/cover1.gif"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-421" title="cover1" src="http://smartfootball.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/cover1.gif" alt="cover1" width="575" height="457" /></a><br />
This coverage is man-to-man with a FS to help over the top. The PSR is based on the alignment of the Cs and linebackers on the receivers. The C’s will be head up or in an outside alignment because they have help from the FS. This allows the C’s to take away the outs. Also, if the SS aligns head up on his eligible receiver at a tight to normal depth (four to six [4-6] yards) and the FS is deeper than normal (twelve to fifteen [12-15] yards), this will confirm the Man with a Free (“MwF”) coverage. The linebackers will have the backs man-to-man. The QB should anticipate pressure from a five (5) man rush, with the possibility of the defense bringing seven (7). The QB must identify whether a blitz is coming and throw the ball to the defenders vacated spot (i.e., “hot read”) or add protection with an audible.</p>
<p><strong>Strengths</strong></p>
<ol>
<li>Pressure from a five (5) man rush</li>
<li>every potential receiver is accounted for (covered)</li>
<li>defenders have help to the post • excellent versus screens and delays</li>
<li>C’s can play a tight man as they have help from the FS &#8211; crowd the receivers on third and five or longer</li>
<li>excellent versus zone routes</li>
<li>can take away the outs with an outside technique by the C’s</li>
<li>speed on speed – good blitz coverage</li>
</ol>
<p><em>- Weaknesses</em></p>
<ol>
<li> Poor run support</li>
<li>mismatch with the backs versus linebackers</li>
<li>hard to disguise versus motion</li>
<li>three deep zones are not covered</li>
<li>no under cover • crossing routes</li>
<li>“bunch” and “snug” type sets</li>
</ol>
<p><em>- How to attack it</em></p>
<ol>
<li> Back routes on the linebackers</li>
<li>create mismatches with the TE running option (“read”) routes</li>
<li>stay shallow with routes, catch the ball short and run long</li>
<li>crossing routes (“mesh”) with the wide receivers</li>
<li>TE in the alley or fades to the wide receivers</li>
<li>running plays</li>
<li>coverage away from FS by “looking off”</li>
</ol>
<p><strong>Cover 0 / Man-to-man blitz with no deep safety</strong></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://smartfootball.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/cover0blitz.gif"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-422" title="cover0blitz" src="http://smartfootball.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/cover0blitz.gif" alt="cover0blitz" width="575" height="451" /></a><br />
</strong><br />
This coverage is a straight man-to-man with no safety help. The PSR is based on the alignment of the safeties. Usually in Man coverage, the SS will play head up on the TE and the FS will play shallow on the weak side. Typically, there is no safety in the middle of the field. We can confirm this coverage by the inside leverage alignment by the Cs on the wide receivers. The C’s need this alignment as they have no inside help. The QB should anticipate pressure from a blitz. The QB must identify whether a blitz is coming and throw the ball to the defenders vacated spot or a crossing receiver; i.e., “hot read”. The QB could audible to add pass protection.</p>
<p><em>- Strengths</em></p>
<ol>
<li> Pressure (blitz capability) and penetration from a six to seven man rush</li>
<li>big play potential</li>
<li>clog up the running lanes inside</li>
<li>force the offense to throw short</li>
</ol>
<p><em>- Weaknesses</em></p>
<ol>
<li> Poor run support</li>
<li>mismatch with the backs versus linebackers</li>
<li>hard to disguise versus motion</li>
<li>three deep zones are not covered</li>
<li>no under cover</li>
<li>crossing routes</li>
<li>no deep help</li>
<li>gamble defense</li>
<li>“bunch” and “snug” type sets</li>
</ol>
<p><em>- How to attack it</em></p>
<ol>
<li>Empty Formations &#8212; all receivers are one-on-one (but free rusher)</li>
<li>tough to cover slants &#8211; nobody in the middle</li>
<li>running plays &#8211; force and secondary force weakened</li>
<li>should have somebody open if QB has time</li>
</ol>
<p><strong>Quarter, Quarter, Half</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://smartfootball.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/qtrqtr.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-423" title="qtrqtr" src="http://smartfootball.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/qtrqtr.jpg" alt="qtrqtr" width="420" height="315" /></a><br />
The Quarter, Quarter, Half (“QQH”) coverage provides three (3) defenders deep, however it uses one (1) defender to cover half (½) of the three (3) deep zones and two (2) defenders each covering a quarter (¼). The underneath coverage can utilize four or five (4 or 5) defenders. This coverage employs a traditional weak side 2D with a squat corner and half coverage safety. The strong side can employ a multitude of variations (invert and rolls). The most common is a bail technique by the strong side C covering the deep quarter (¼) with the strong side OLB covering curl to flat. The PSR is based on the depth and alignment of the C’s and safeties. The weakside or side away from the quarters alignment will look like a 2D with the C head-up or to the outside of the wide receiver and the safety near the hash marks, aligned deeper than the C. The strong C can be aligned head-up and tight, but will bail (retreat) so that they are off six to eight (6-8) yards at the snap. The SS will be even with the C at the snap, and can also employ a bail technique.</p>
<p><em>- Strengths</em></p>
<ol>
<li>Leverage on weak wide receiver, can use bump technique</li>
<li>deep routes to strong side</li>
<li>cover five (5) of the six (6) underneath zones</li>
<li>four (4) man rush</li>
<li>weakside force and contain</li>
<li>easy to disguise</li>
<li>can double (inside/outside) against a single receiver to the weak side</li>
</ol>
<p><em>- Weaknesses</em></p>
<ol>
<li>Weak safety must cover half  the field</li>
<li>flood routes to the strong side</li>
<li>S must cover curl and flat</li>
<li>strong side contain</li>
<li>weak inside linebacker to curl</li>
<li>wide splits can create lanes</li>
</ol>
<p><em>- How to attack it</em></p>
<ol>
<li> Horizontal stretch on the safety covering half</li>
<li>vertically stretch the flats to create lanes</li>
<li>strong side outs</li>
<li>weakside curl</li>
<li>cannot cover a flood route (three or four [3 or 4] receivers in the pattern)</li>
<li>trips type formations &amp; motion</li>
</ol>
<p><strong>Zone Blitz</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://smartfootball.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/03_graph_2.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-424" title="03_graph_2" src="http://smartfootball.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/03_graph_2.jpg" alt="03_graph_2" width="480" height="412" /></a></p>
<p>The Zone Blitz is a defensive scheme used to confuse the offensive line’s pass protection schemes, and the QB’s reads. A frontal rusher &#8212; i.e. a linebacker or defensive lineman &#8211;  briefly engages the offensive lineman, then retreats to his pass zone, if he reads pass. The blitzers go through their assigned gaps. The droppers replace the blitzers in the pass zone. The coverage could be anything, but the most common zone blitz is the &#8220;fire zone,&#8221; which involves three deep and three intermediate pattern reading defenders.</p>
<p><em>- Strengths</em></p>
<ol>
<li>Run lanes are covered</li>
<li>pressure on the QB – confuse protection schemes</li>
<li>QB reads are changed</li>
<li>easy to disguise</li>
<li>can double (inside/outside) against outside receivers and cover underneath zone with defensive linemen</li>
</ol>
<p><em>- Weaknesses</em></p>
<ol>
<li> Defensive linemen and other defenders in coverage who are not skilled/used to it – limited range</li>
<li>crossing routes through the underneath coverage</li>
<li>play action, if offense can protect</li>
</ol>
<p><em>- How to attack it</em></p>
<ol>
<li> Horizontal and vertical stretch on the pass zones</li>
<li>TE versus defensive linemen</li>
<li>screen passes</li>
<li>play action, with patterns to the backs</li>
<li>Maximum protection with deep combinations through the open areas</li>
</ol>
<p><strong>Cover 1 &#8220;Robber&#8221; </strong></p>
<p><a href="http://smartfootball.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/prorat.gif"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-425" title="prorat" src="http://smartfootball.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/prorat.gif" alt="prorat" width="581" height="255" /></a><br />
The Robber coverage is a defensive scheme used to confuse the QB’s reads. It is designed to take away the middle pass zones, both the underneath and deep middle. It can be employed out of a four across or two deep look. A QB reading through the middle of the field (goal post) will read man or rotation and attempt to hit crossing routes or attack the deep middle which is where the “robber” is. The coverage can also be used with man coverage allowing the “robber” helping out in the middle.</p>
<p><em>- Strengths</em></p>
<ol>
<li> Middle zones</li>
<li>confuse QB’s reads</li>
<li>easy to disguise</li>
<li>can double (inside/outside) against inside receivers</li>
<li>can lock-on QB’s eyes</li>
</ol>
<p><em>- Weaknesses</em></p>
<ol>
<li> Deep outside versus man</li>
<li>outside breaking routes by inside receivers</li>
<li>play action</li>
</ol>
<p><em>- How to attack it</em></p>
<ol>
<li> Outside on timing routes</li>
<li>play action with deep routes</li>
<li>crossing routes to the outside versus man</li>
<li>QB must look robber off</li>
<li>clear lane throws</li>
</ol>
<p><strong>Prevent</strong><br />
The Prevent is a defensive scheme designed to force the offense to use time to score. It protects against the quick scores, while allowing the offense to pick up chuncks of yardages. The QB must be descipline when facing the Prevent by taking the easy yardage. At the high school and collegiate level, attack the middle of the prevent because the clock stops to move the chains for first downs. The defense linemen will use outside rush techniques to keep the QB in the pocket. The QB must be patient throwing in the underneath zones to recievers on the run.</p>
<p><em>- Strengths</em></p>
<ol>
<li> Deep zones, four defenders deep</li>
<li>can get under deep outs and curls</li>
<li>can keep the QB in the pocket with an outside rush</li>
<li>defensive backs can fly to the ball when it is thrown deep</li>
<li>protect the boundary</li>
</ol>
<p><em>- Weaknesses</em></p>
<ol>
<li> Inside run &#8211; draws</li>
<li>backs on delays to middle</li>
<li>middle hook zones</li>
<li>quick routes on time</li>
<li>in the undercover seams</li>
</ol>
<p><em>- How to attack it</em></p>
<ol>
<li> Horizontally stretch the pass zones</li>
<li>deep crossing routes</li>
<li>underneath at twelve yards or less with stops, flats and outs on time</li>
<li>empty sets</li>
<li>draws</li>
<li>backs on delays</li>
<li>get the ball to speed underneath</li>
</ol>
<p><strong>Review</strong><br />
A critical component to a successful pass is that the quarterback recognize the coverage. Materials given to a quarterback (DVD, flash cards)</p>
<ol>
<li>Quick recognition of the secondary.</li>
<li>The strengths and weaknesses of the coverage.</li>
<li>Where to attack the coverage based upon the play called.</li>
</ol>
<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsmartfootball.com%2Fpassing%2Fattacking-coverages-in-the-passing-game"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsmartfootball.com%2Fpassing%2Fattacking-coverages-in-the-passing-game&amp;source=smartfootball&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://smartfootball.com/passing/attacking-coverages-in-the-passing-game/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
